Which statement correctly differentiates knowledge of performance from knowledge of result?

Which statement correctly differentiates knowledge of performance from knowledge of result?

• A. Knowledge of performance concerns the outcome of performance
• B. Knowledge of performance concerns how the movement was performed
• C. Knowledge of result concerns how well the movement was performed
• D. Knowledge of result is internal feedback

Answer: (B)

The key idea is telling you about the difference between how a movement is performed and what the result of the movement is. Knowledge of performance focuses on the quality of the movement itself—the technique, form, timing, coordination, and how the action is carried out. It helps a performer adjust the method to improve technique. Knowledge of result, in contrast, is about the outcome—the end result or score of the attempt, such as whether the ball went in, how far the player ran, or what the final time was. It doesn’t describe how the movement was executed. So the statement that knowledge of performance concerns how the movement was performed is the correct differentiation. The idea that knowledge of performance concerns the outcome is inaccurate, and the idea that knowledge of result concerns how well the movement was performed mixes up outcome with technique. The notion that knowledge of result is internal feedback is also off, since knowledge of result typically relates to the external outcome rather than the performer’s internal sense of movement.

The key idea is telling you about the difference between how a movement is performed and what the result of the movement is. Knowledge of performance focuses on the quality of the movement itself—the technique, form, timing, coordination, and how the action is carried out. It helps a performer adjust the method to improve technique.

Knowledge of result, in contrast, is about the outcome—the end result or score of the attempt, such as whether the ball went in, how far the player ran, or what the final time was. It doesn’t describe how the movement was executed.

So the statement that knowledge of performance concerns how the movement was performed is the correct differentiation. The idea that knowledge of performance concerns the outcome is inaccurate, and the idea that knowledge of result concerns how well the movement was performed mixes up outcome with technique. The notion that knowledge of result is internal feedback is also off, since knowledge of result typically relates to the external outcome rather than the performer’s internal sense of movement.